Code and Context logoCode & Context

The AI Paradox: 4 Reasons Why Making Work Cheaper Creates More of It

History shows efficiency doesn't reduce work—it explodes it. Here's why AI will create more opportunities, not fewer, through the lens of Jevons Paradox.

SP

Saurabh Prakash

Author

Dec 31, 20254 min read
The AI Paradox: 4 Reasons Why Making Work Cheaper Creates More of It
Share:

Many professionals feel a seismic shift under their feet. AI researcher Andrej Karpathy captured this anxiety perfectly:

A magnitude 9 earthquake is rocking the profession... powerful alien tools handed to us without a manual.

But what if this earthquake is opening more possibilities than it's closing?

History suggests major efficiency gains don't lead to less work—they lead to an explosion of it.


1. Jevons Paradox Comes for Knowledge Work

The Core Insight

When 19th-century technology made coal more efficient, total coal demand didn't decrease—it skyrocketed. Making a resource cheaper unlocks use cases that were previously unimaginable.

This pattern has repeated in computing:

EraUnits
MainframesHundreds
MinicomputersTens of thousands
PCsMillions

Each leap: roughly 100x growth.

Now it's happening to knowledge work: reviewing contracts, writing code, generating campaigns, market research, customer support.

Jevons paradox is coming to knowledge work. By making it far cheaper to take on any type of task, we're ultimately going to be doing far more.

Aaron Levie, CEO of Box


2. Your "Boring" Engineering Skills Are Now a Superpower

In a world of rapidly advancing AI, it's easy to assume foundational skills are becoming obsolete.

The reality is the opposite.

Google Cloud's Addy Osmani highlights the skills that matter most:

  • ✅ CI/CD pipelines
  • ✅ Testing
  • ✅ Documentation
  • ✅ Code review

These "boring" foundations turn AI agents from chaos generators into productivity multipliers.

Developers who already invested in CI/CD, testing, documentation, and code review are having the most success with AI tools. These "boring" foundations are accelerators.

Addy Osmani


3. The Job Shifts from 'How' to 'What'

The nature of knowledge work is changing. Professionals are learning to operate at a different altitude.

The New Reality

The bottleneck is shifting from "can we build this?" to "should we build this?"

Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code, offers a stunning example:

In a single month, he landed 259 pull requests—over 78,000 lines of code changed—with every single line written by AI.

Increasingly, code is no longer the bottleneck.

Boris Cherny

The human role has evolved into that of a director, guiding powerful tools to achieve a strategic vision.


4. Fortune 500 Power in Every Entrepreneur's Pocket

Historically, large corporations could absorb high investment costs. Small teams faced brutal tradeoffs: marketing vs. product vs. support?

AI blows up this constraint.

Imagine a 10-person services firm that never had custom software because the project was too large to start. Now someone on that team can build a prototype in days.

AI gives every business access to the talent and resources of a Fortune 500 company 10 years ago.

Aaron Levie


The Bottom Line

The pattern is clear:

EraWhat Got CheaperResult
1800sCoal efficiencyMore coal consumption
1990s–2020sComputingMore software everywhere
2025+Knowledge workMore projects, more experiments, more innovation

We don't do less work when things get efficient. We discover we've been massively under-investing in all the things worth doing.

The Critical Question

Are we prepared for a world where the bottleneck shifts from "can we build this?" to "should we build this?"


Key Takeaways for Your Career

  1. Invest in judgment, taste, and strategic thinking—these become the differentiators
  2. Double down on "boring" foundations—testing, CI/CD, documentation
  3. Think like a director—guide AI tools rather than compete with them
  4. Lower activation energy—projects once too expensive to start are now viable

The earthquake is real. But it's creating new ground, not just swallowing the old.


What's your take? Are you seeing Jevons Paradox play out in your work? Share your experience in the comments.